Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Herbie Bradley's avatar

This is fun, but one key thing (as Ethan alludes to in another comment) is how does this differ from IFS/parts analysis, or other discretizations? Parts usually implies that the components are deeper, more comprehensive/coherent, and persistant than shards (parts are something closer to personas). Your point about emergence of conciousness also applies to IFS pretty well.

I'm sure there is probably some nice synthesis framing.

Expand full comment
Ethan's avatar

Sounds reasonable, but make sure not to overcount on the consciousness bit! That sort of functionality is also predicted by most theories, wouldn’t be much evidence for shard theory in particular.

Also, interactions between shards remain critically under-described! What even is “a” shard? This seems to imply a sort of discretization which needs to be justified. Why not a continuous blob of hive mind with some especially pointy regions, but broadly the same mush?

Expand full comment

No posts